Build a complete inventory of active programmes, products and recurring tasks and score each one against value and cost of continuation.
Leadership & Management
Strategic Abandonment and Deciding What the Organisation Stops Doing
Equips managers with a structured method for reviewing existing activities, applying kill criteria and sunset plans, and reallocating freed capacity to higher-value work across the organisation.
🗓️Duration5 training days
📚Content4 modules · 8 sessions
🎓On completionAccredited attendance certificate
About the programme
Course Overview
Most organisations have well-developed processes for starting new work but no equivalent discipline for stopping it, so programmes, reports, tools and recurring meetings keep running long after their value has faded. This course treats strategic abandonment as a management discipline in its own right: a structured, recurring process for deciding what the organisation should stop doing so that budget, time and leadership attention move to higher-value work. Participants build a complete activity inventory, score each item against value and cost of continuation, and apply explicit kill criteria at stage-gate style decision sessions. The course draws on Peter Drucker's planned abandonment question, research on sunk cost fallacy and escalation of commitment, and portfolio rationalisation methods used in stage-gate governance. Sessions combine short input with a live audit exercise, where participants bring an activity from their own area and take it through the full review, from inventory entry to kill criteria, sign-off, discontinuation communication and decommissioning. Participants leave with a reusable abandonment review template, a set of kill criteria they can adapt, and a communication plan for closing an activity without damaging trust with staff, customers or partners.
Expected Learning Outcomes
Apply explicit kill criteria and decision gates to determine which activities should be sunset, reduced or continued unchanged.
Distinguish genuine strategic trade-offs from sunk cost reasoning and escalation of commitment when reviewing underperforming initiatives.
Design a stakeholder sign-off process that gives the right decision rights to sponsors, finance and affected teams before work stops.
Draft a discontinuation communication plan that explains the reasoning to staff, customers and partners without reputational damage.
Produce a decommissioning checklist covering data retention, knowledge capture, contract closure and system switch-off.
Reallocate capacity freed by abandonment into a prioritised list of higher-value initiatives and track the transfer through to delivery.
Who Should Attend
Senior managers responsible for portfolios of programmes, products or services that have grown without periodic review.
Heads of PMO and portfolio managers who run stage-gate or investment committee decisions.
Finance business partners involved in budget reviews and zero-based budgeting exercises.
Operations directors managing legacy processes and systems scheduled for decommissioning.
Change managers tasked with communicating discontinuation of programmes to affected staff.
Functional leaders in mature organisations where activity has accumulated faster than capacity.
Course Modules
Select any module to see its sessions and points.
01The Discipline of Organised Stopping
2 sessions · 8 points
Session 1Recognising the Cost of Undisciplined Continuation
- Map how legacy programmes, recurring meetings and inherited processes accumulate once no one owns a stop decision.
- Distinguish sunk cost fallacy and escalation of commitment from legitimate reasons to continue funding a struggling initiative.
- Quantify the hidden cost of continuation using capacity, budget and leadership attention as the three constrained resources.
- Examine why starting initiatives earns visible credit while stopping them is treated as an admission of failure.
Session 2Establishing a Recurring Abandonment Review
- Apply Peter Drucker's planned abandonment question to test whether an existing activity would be started today if it did not already exist.
- Design a review calendar that pairs each annual planning cycle with a mandatory review of activities eligible for discontinuation.
- Assign an executive sponsor and review board with explicit authority to close, not just approve, initiatives.
- Set review triggers linked to renewal dates, licence expiries and milestone reviews so abandonment is scheduled, not reactive.
02Identifying and Evaluating Candidates for Abandonment
2 sessions · 8 points
Session 1Building the Activity Inventory and Value Map
- Compile a complete inventory of programmes, products, recurring reports and standing meetings across the unit under review.
- Score each activity on strategic value, running cost and opportunity cost using a consistent value-effort matrix.
- Interview activity owners to surface undocumented dependencies before an item is shortlisted for discontinuation.
- Flag activities kept alive purely by habit, historic sponsorship or a single stakeholder's preference.
Session 2Applying Kill Criteria and Decision Gates
- Draft explicit kill criteria covering performance thresholds, cost ceilings and strategic fit before any review meeting begins.
- Run a stage-gate style decision session where each candidate activity is continued, reduced, paused or closed.
- Separate the decision to stop funding from the decision to stop all activity, since some items need a wind-down period.
- Document the rationale for every decision so future reviewers understand why an activity was kept or closed.
03Governing the Abandonment Decision
2 sessions · 8 points
Session 1Assigning Decision Rights and Sign-off
- Define who holds the authority to approve closure, who must be consulted and who only needs to be informed, using a RACI matrix.
- Involve finance, legal and risk functions early when abandonment triggers contract termination or regulatory notification.
- Set escalation routes for disputed decisions where an activity owner disagrees with a closure recommendation.
- Time-box the decision process so candidates are not left in limbo while sponsors debate indefinitely.
Session 2Communicating Discontinuation Without Damage
- Draft a discontinuation narrative that explains the reasoning in terms of priorities rather than blame.
- Sequence communication to staff, customers, suppliers and partners so no group learns of a closure secondhand.
- Prepare responses to predictable objections, including loss of familiar tools and concern about job security.
- Brief line managers on likely questions from affected teams before the announcement is made.
04Executing Abandonment and Redeploying Capacity
2 sessions · 8 points
Session 1Decommissioning and Knowledge Capture
- Build a decommissioning checklist covering data retention, licence cancellation, system switch-off and contract closure.
- Capture tacit knowledge from the outgoing activity through structured handover sessions before the team disperses.
- Confirm regulatory and audit obligations for record retention before deleting data or archiving systems.
- Verify that dependent processes and reports have a confirmed replacement before the source activity is switched off.
Session 2Reallocating Capacity and Sustaining the Discipline
- Transfer freed budget and headcount into a ranked list of priority initiatives agreed with the leadership team.
- Track redeployed capacity for two full cycles to confirm it reached the intended priority rather than dispersing informally.
- Review the abandonment process itself after each cycle and refine the criteria that produced weak or contested decisions.
- Embed the stop question into existing planning rituals so abandonment becomes routine rather than a one-off exercise.
What the participant receives
4 course modules
A structured syllabus
8 training sessions
across 5 days
32 detailed points
Applied, detailed content
Accredited attendance certificate
On completing the programme
Complete your registration
We will contact you within one business day to confirm.
Ready to start?
Reserve your seat and start building the skill.