Define a benchmarking study's scope, purpose and comparison metrics before selecting a partner.
Quality & Productivity
Competitive Benchmarking Studies for Identifying Best Practice Gaps
Scope a benchmarking study, select comparable partners and normalised metrics, analyse the resulting performance gaps, and turn transferable best practice into a funded, owned improvement plan.
🗓️Duration5 training days
📚Content4 modules · 8 sessions
🎓On completionAccredited attendance certificate
About the programme
Course Overview
A benchmarking study that only produces a ranking has wasted its data: the value is in finding a practice that explains the gap and can actually be adopted. This course teaches benchmarking as a disciplined study rather than a survey exercise, from defining a precise scope and comparison metric through selecting internal, competitive or functional partners suited to the question being asked. Sessions cover designing data collection instruments that ask every partner the same defined question, normalising results for scale and geography, and applying the confidentiality and ethical conduct that keep a benchmarking relationship distinct from competitive intelligence gathering. Later sessions move from calculating a performance gap to investigating the practice behind a partner's result, judging what is genuinely transferable, and building a gap-closing plan with named owners and interim metrics. Participants finish able to run a benchmarking study end to end and keep a programme running across repeat cycles rather than a single one-off report.
Expected Learning Outcomes
Choose internal, competitive or functional benchmarking partners suited to the question being studied.
Design a data collection instrument and normalise results for fair comparison across organisations.
Apply benchmarking ethics and confidentiality agreements that distinguish it from competitive intelligence.
Calculate and segment performance gaps to identify where a real practice difference, not noise, exists.
Investigate a top performer's practice and judge how much of it is genuinely transferable elsewhere.
Build a gap-closing action plan with named owners, interim metrics and a repeat benchmarking cycle.
Who Should Attend
Operations, quality and process improvement managers scoping a benchmarking study.
Business analysts and strategy staff comparing performance against external organisations.
Continuous improvement practitioners searching for transferable best practice beyond their sector.
Functional leaders in operations, service or support wanting a rigorous comparison method.
Programme managers responsible for building a repeatable, ethical benchmarking capability.
Consultants and internal advisers who run benchmarking studies on behalf of client teams.
Course Modules
Select any module to see its sessions and points.
01Scoping a Benchmarking Study and Selecting Metrics
2 sessions · 8 points
Session 1Defining the Study's Purpose, Scope and Comparison Metrics
- Define the specific process or metric the benchmarking study will examine before selecting any comparison partner.
- Set the study's scope narrow enough that data collection and comparison remain achievable within a set timeframe.
- Choose comparison metrics that are meaningful to the process owner and can be defined consistently across sites.
- Agree what a successful outcome for the study looks like before data collection begins, not after results arrive.
Session 2Choosing Benchmarking Partners and Comparison Types
- Distinguish internal, competitive and functional benchmarking, and choose the type that fits the study's purpose.
- Select benchmarking partners of comparable scale, geography or process type so the comparison remains meaningful.
- Approach a functional benchmarking partner outside the sector where a comparable process may perform differently.
- Use published surveys or industry data sources where a direct partner relationship is not practical to arrange.
02Collecting Comparable Data Ethically and Rigorously
2 sessions · 8 points
Session 1Designing Data Collection Instruments and Normalisation Rules
- Design a data collection instrument, such as a structured questionnaire, that asks every partner the same question.
- Define each metric precisely, including its formula and unit, so partners are not comparing dissimilar figures.
- Normalise collected data for scale, currency or geography before any comparison is presented as a genuine gap.
- Pilot the data collection instrument with one partner before circulating it more widely to catch ambiguous wording.
Session 2Applying Benchmarking Ethics and Confidentiality Agreements
- Apply recognised benchmarking ethics, sharing information only on terms every participating organisation has accepted.
- Put a confidentiality agreement in place before requesting data that a partner would not otherwise disclose.
- Separate legitimate benchmarking from competitive intelligence gathering that a partner has not knowingly agreed to.
- Agree how findings will be shared and attributed before publishing any result that identifies a benchmarking partner.
03Analysing Gaps and Identifying Transferable Best Practice
2 sessions · 8 points
Session 1Analysing Performance Gaps Against Comparable Organisations
- Calculate the performance gap between the organisation and its comparison group for each defined metric.
- Segment gap analysis by site, product line or region to avoid a single average concealing real variation.
- Test whether an apparent gap reflects a genuine practice difference or an artefact of how data was normalised.
- Rank identified gaps by size and strategic importance to focus the next analysis stage on what matters most.
Session 2Distinguishing Transferable Practice from Context-Specific Advantage
- Investigate the practice behind a top-performing partner's result rather than adopting the number alone.
- Distinguish a practice that is transferable from one that depends on a partner's unique scale, market or history.
- Adapt an external practice to the organisation's own constraints instead of copying it without modification.
- Validate a proposed adaptation with the people who will operate it before committing it to an improvement plan.
04Turning Findings into an Adopted Improvement Plan
2 sessions · 8 points
Session 1Building a Gap-Closing Action Plan From Benchmarking Findings
- Build an action plan that assigns an owner, a target metric and a date to each identified best practice adoption.
- Prioritise actions that close the largest or most strategically important gaps identified during the analysis.
- Present benchmarking findings and the resulting action plan to sponsors in a form that supports a funding decision.
- Set the interim metrics that will show whether an adopted practice is closing the gap as expected.
Session 2Sustaining a Benchmarking Programme Through Repeat Cycles
- Schedule a repeat benchmarking cycle so comparisons stay current as partners and the organisation both improve.
- Maintain relationships with benchmarking partners between formal studies so future data requests are easier to arrange.
- Review which past benchmarking findings were actually adopted, and why others were not, before a new cycle starts.
- Build an internal library of benchmarking findings and adopted practices so future studies do not start from zero.
What the participant receives
4 course modules
A structured syllabus
8 training sessions
across 5 days
32 detailed points
Applied, detailed content
Accredited attendance certificate
On completing the programme
Complete your registration
We will contact you within one business day to confirm.
Ready to start?
Reserve your seat and start building the skill.