Apply ISO 31000 principles, framework and process to structure a security-specific risk management approach.
Security Management
Aligning Security Governance Frameworks to ISO 31000
Align security governance with ISO 31000 risk management principles so security risk is owned, reported and escalated through the same structures as every other enterprise risk.
🗓️Duration5 training days
📚Content4 modules · 8 sessions
🎓On completionAccredited attendance certificate
About the programme
Course Overview
Security risk in many organisations is tracked in a separate register, reported through a separate committee and assessed using criteria nobody else in the business recognises, leaving boards unable to compare security exposure against financial, operational or reputational risk on equal terms. This course works through aligning security governance to ISO 31000, the internationally recognised risk management standard, so security risk is identified, assessed and escalated using the same principles, framework and process as the rest of the organisation. Participants learn to translate ISO 31000's risk criteria and evaluation approach into security-specific registers and heat maps, integrate security reporting into a three lines of defence model, and connect departmental risk assessments to a board-level risk appetite statement. The course also addresses where security risk assessment techniques, drawing on standards such as ISO 31010, still need discipline-specific adaptation even once the reporting structure is aligned. A governance-mapping exercise against a sample enterprise risk framework gives participants practice producing a security risk register that a chief risk officer would accept without needing translation.
Expected Learning Outcomes
Translate enterprise risk criteria and appetite statements into terms usable for security risk assessment.
Build a security risk register and heat map consistent with the organisation's wider risk reporting format.
Integrate security risk reporting into a three lines of defence governance model used across the organisation.
Escalate security risks to enterprise risk committees using shared terminology and comparable risk ratings.
Select risk assessment techniques, informed by standards such as ISO 31010, suited to security-specific risks.
Map security governance roles and responsibilities against the organisation's existing risk governance structure.
Who Should Attend
Chief security officers responsible for integrating security risk into enterprise risk frameworks.
Risk managers and chief risk officers overseeing enterprise-wide risk governance and reporting.
Security managers who currently maintain a stand-alone risk register disconnected from wider governance.
Internal audit and second-line risk functions reviewing security risk governance arrangements.
Board risk committee members seeking to understand security risk in comparable enterprise risk terms.
Governance, risk and compliance specialists supporting alignment across multiple risk disciplines.
Course Modules
Select any module to see its sessions and points.
01ISO 31000 Principles and Framework
2 sessions · 8 points
Session 1Understanding ISO 31000
- Explain the principles, framework and process structure that ISO 31000 sets out for risk management.
- Identify how ISO 31000 treats risk criteria, risk appetite and risk attitude as organisation-specific inputs.
- Distinguish ISO 31000's principles-based approach from prescriptive, checklist-style risk methodologies.
- Assess how far current risk management arrangements already reflect ISO 31000 principles in practice.
Session 2Mapping Security Governance Against the Standard
- Compare existing security governance structures against the roles ISO 31000 assigns to leadership.
- Identify gaps where security risk governance operates outside the organisation's mainstream risk framework.
- Define the mandate and resources security risk owners need to operate consistently with the standard.
- Plan a phased alignment approach rather than attempting to rebuild governance structures all at once.
02Integrating Risk Criteria and Appetite
2 sessions · 8 points
Session 1Translating Enterprise Risk Criteria
- Translate enterprise-wide risk criteria and scoring scales into terms meaningful for security risk assessment.
- Align likelihood and consequence definitions so security risks can be compared directly with other risk types.
- Incorporate the organisation's documented risk appetite statement into security risk evaluation decisions.
- Resolve conflicts where security-specific risk factors do not map cleanly onto generic enterprise criteria.
Session 2Building an Aligned Risk Register
- Build a security risk register using the format, fields and rating scale used elsewhere in the organisation.
- Populate a risk heat map that allows security risks to be plotted alongside financial and operational risks.
- Assign risk owners and review dates consistent with the organisation's wider risk register discipline.
- Maintain register currency through a review cycle aligned with the enterprise risk reporting calendar.
03Governance Structures and Reporting Lines
2 sessions · 8 points
Session 1Three Lines of Defence for Security
- Position security risk management within a three lines of defence model alongside operational risk.
- Define the first-line responsibilities of security operations distinct from second-line oversight functions.
- Establish independent assurance activity that tests security risk controls without duplicating first-line work.
- Clarify escalation triggers that move a security risk from operational management to committee attention.
Session 2Reporting to Risk Committees and the Board
- Prepare security risk reports in the format and cadence expected by enterprise risk or audit committees.
- Present security risk trends and control effectiveness using terminology shared with other risk disciplines.
- Support board risk committee members in interpreting security-specific risk without needing translation.
- Escalate emerging security risks promptly enough for governance bodies to act before impact occurs.
04Sustaining Alignment and Assessment Practice
2 sessions · 8 points
Session 1Applying Risk Assessment Techniques
- Select risk assessment techniques appropriate to security risks, informed by guidance such as ISO 31010.
- Apply qualitative and quantitative assessment methods consistently across categories of security risk.
- Validate security risk assessments through peer review or challenge from outside the security function.
- Document assessment methodology so risk ratings can be explained and defended during governance review.
Session 2Maintaining Alignment Over Time
- Review alignment between security governance and ISO 31000 periodically as both risk and structure evolve.
- Update security risk criteria and registers when the organisation revises its enterprise risk framework.
- Train security staff on shared risk terminology so alignment survives staff turnover in either function.
- Use audit findings and governance feedback to correct drift away from agreed alignment over time.
What the participant receives
4 course modules
A structured syllabus
8 training sessions
across 5 days
32 detailed points
Applied, detailed content
Accredited attendance certificate
On completing the programme
Complete your registration
We will contact you within one business day to confirm.
Ready to start?
Reserve your seat and start building the skill.